In our class, we have begun to discuss the views of Immanuel
Kant, an Enlightenment thinker. During
this era, there was a cultural movement towards the pursuit of knowledge. This
era wanted to bring out individualism rather than go by what the Church says. In
this era, Kant talks about three branches of philosophy: logic, physics, and
ethics. All three of these are formal areas of inquiry in which Kant goes into
detail.
Kant’s first branch, logic, is a non-empirical type of
philosophy. You gain this area of philosophy by studying rather than practice. His
second branch, physics, is an empirical type of philosophy. This area of philosophy
is gained through practice and observation. The third branch, ethics, is a mix
of both empirical and non-empirical. You learn ethics from others and also
through observing. Kant believed in a need for a “pure” ethics in which the good
will reign. Kant believed that good will existed, which opposed Aristotle, to
help bring logic into our lives. He believes in telos, purpose of something, to
help achieve the good will.
As I said earlier, Kant differs from Aristotle in beliefs.
Aristotle’s belief that virtue is for eudemonia differs from Kant. As time progressed,
society reformed and it was not as civilized as the time Kant lived in.
Therefore, their difference of views are evident cause of the time change. In
my opinion, if Kant had lived in the same time as Aristotle, they would have
agreed with each other on views more.
I agree with a lot of this, Swamy. I never linked Kant's Enlightenment background to his beliefs so you helped it click together way better!
ReplyDeleteI agree with your post. You give a really good explanation of Kant's views, and the reason behind them!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete